Navigating the Kansas State University Course Catalog: A Guide to Open/Alternative Resources

Kansas State University (K-State), with its rich history as the first public land-grant university, has consistently strived to enhance the learning experience for its students. One significant initiative in this endeavor is the Kansas State University Open/Alternative Textbook Initiative. This article delves into the details of this initiative, its implementation, and its impact on the K-State academic landscape.

Introduction: K-State's Commitment to Accessible Education

With a vast community comprising over 20,000 students and approximately 1,300 faculty/instructors in 2019, K-State recognizes the importance of providing affordable and high-quality educational resources. The Open/Alternative Textbook Initiative, launched in 2013, embodies this commitment by replacing costly commercial textbooks with open or alternative resources.

The Genesis of the Open/Alternative Textbook Initiative

The Kansas State University Open/Alternative Textbook Initiative was founded in 2013 by three faculty members with a vision of replacing costly commercial textbooks with open or alternative resources to better support student learning (Lashley et al. 2017). This initiative is deeply rooted in K-State’s mission as the first public land grant university.

Defining Open and Alternative Resources

To qualify for this initiative, resources must be open (defined by K-State as free, online, immediate, and without permissions restrictions) or alternative. Alternative resources must be free, may or may not be subject to permitted use, and/or be immediately accessible through K-State’s learning management system or other student-only access channel.

Student-Driven Funding and Faculty Incentives

Notably, this initiative distinguishes itself as the first open and alternative textbook project with direct financial support from students. The majority percentage of funding used to launch and support the initiative for the first two years ($50,000 and $30,000, respectively) was provided by the student government association (SGA). This funding, and all following funding, has been used to provide awards up to $5,000 for faculty to replace their commercial textbooks with open or alternative educational resources. The initiative’s goal is to encourage the adoption and/or development of cost saving texts for students while improving the quality of the learning process.

Read also: Haskell Indian Nations University

The Open/Alternative Textbook Icon: A Visual Identifier

In late summer 2016, SGA leaders approached Open/Alternative Textbook initiative leaders Andrew Bennett (department head of Mathematics), Rebel Cummings-Sauls (director of the Center for the Advancement of Digital Scholarship), and Brian Lindshield (associate professor of Food, Nutrition, Dietetics, and Health) with the idea of creating an open/alternative textbook icon. Student and initiative leaders agreed that a separate icon would make it easier for students to differentiate (and enroll in) courses that used an open/alternative resource.

The Need for a Differentiating Icon

At the time, open/alternative courses had no icon at all, and it was common for faculty who used an open/alternative resource to get questions from students about why there was no information about a required textbook. The library and initiative leaders also got questions from students on how to obtain textbooks for these courses. Accurately reflecting the materials for these courses was “not possible,” given the bookstore’s focus on traditional textbooks.

The Icon's Functionality and Linkage

Students were accustomed to the traditional textbook icon (Lashley et al. 2017), a black image of a book, which was hyperlinked to a campus store page that provided information about required materials for the course (see fig. 21.1). Since clicking on the icon to find information about the required materials was habitual for students, the new icon would be hyperlinked to a webpage that explained why students did not have to purchase course materials for the course (see fig. During implementation of the icon, the initiative obtained SGA support for a minimal $10 course fee (see fig. 21.2), which is described on K-State’s “Fee Information” page in more detail.

Approval Process for Icon Inclusion

Courses that received and completed K-State’s Open/Alternative Textbook Grant program were automatically approved for inclusion, and these faculty were contacted to approve their participation in the icon program. Courses that were already using open or alternative resources or who converted their courses without the grant could apply for approval and inclusion in the icon program. This required faculty to submit the resource for final review by an initiative leader. The icon is added only to courses that use an initiative-approved, no-cost, open/alternative resource, thus identifying sections eligible for the K-State open/alternative textbook course fee (Lashley et al.

The Icon Design Process: A Collaborative Effort

A committee of initiative leaders and implementing partners, led by SGA, was formed to tackle design. The implementing partners included a representative overseeing K-State’s student information system, KSIS (PeopleSoft), the director of web services, a representative from the registrar’s office, and a number of representatives from the information systems office.

Read also: Affording KU

Initial Inspirations and Challenges

Wanting to draw inspiration from existing open-access textbook icons, the committee perused existing options. The group liked the College Open Textbooks icon because it simultaneously gives students the familiar perception of a book while suggesting alternative material types (see fig. 21.3). The icon could be adapted with a slight modification, changing the blue to purple to fit institutional colors. When this design went to the icon development partners in communication and marketing, however, it came under some scrutiny. Campus implementing partners suggested taking the black default book icon and making it purple. Committee members shared a concern that this simple modification fell short of its mission and would not be striking or different enough for most students to identify the change. A purple padlock design, inspired by the open-access icon, was suggested. However, other implementing partners found its meaning unclear.

The Final Design: A Purple "O"

At this point, implementation partners moved forward on the icon’s design without involving the committee in its development or selection. The proposed design featured a bold white O on the new textbook icon, a stylized black image of a book, which was being implemented around the same time. Two designs were developed with a graphic artist, exploring creative options around the acronym for open/alternative resources-OAR (see fig. 21.4). The committee was split on which design they liked best. The committee returned to the O icon and requested that the designers make the book purple (see fig. 21.5). This final design aligned with K-State pride and was differentiated from the regular textbook icon, fulfilling the original function desired when the committee began the development process. Most important, the initiative was growing on campus and all parties agreed that it met their critical requirements. The design was approved by all stakeholders.

Placement and Accessibility of the Icon

Initiative partners asked SGA representatives about their preference for where to include the open/alternative textbook course icon and link in the course schedule. SGA indicated that they would like it as its own bullet point below the Course Schedule Information title and text. This provided a prominent location for students to identify this new icon. Following this recommendation, along with implementation partners additional setup suggestions, allowed the implementing team to provide a one-click listing of all open/alternative courses. Figure 21.6 shows what this page looks like now, including the open/alternative course listing link with the new icon. Figure 21.7 shows the list of approved open/alternative textbook courses. Figure 21.8 shows what the icon looks like in PeopleSoft, where students elect courses in which they want to enroll.

Implementation in the Course Catalog and Enrollment System

This was accomplished utilizing the delivered class attribute functionality to apply an “Open Textbook” attribute to the appropriate class sections. Implementation partners and staff made a modification to the Class Search feature to display the new icon for those class sections denoted with the attribute.

Timeline and Coordination

Federal and university deadlines require textbook reporting of the approved list of courses must be completed almost a semester in advance, regardless of whether open and alternative resources are used, though this timing can vary depending on local environment. Each semester the initiative leaders create a list of approved courses that will receive the open/alternative icon designation the following semester. Initially, to ease the burden on the university registrar’s office, initiative leaders were going to code the courses within the enrollment system, and one partner was fully trained to code courses. After one semester, however, it was clear that frequent updates to the system and process strained initiative leaders’ ability to keep the coding up to date; the one partner who completed full training was not able to complete the first-round entries because of workflow and display changes in the system. Implementation partners in the registrar’s office agreed to take on this responsibility each semester.

Read also: The University of Kansas explained

Impact and Communication of the Icon

The O icon has been instrumental in increasingly identifying open/alternative courses over several years. For example, figure 21.9 describes the number of courses that have utilized the icon from Fall 2016 to Summer 2019.

Communication Channels

After implementing the O icon, K-State used several channels to communicate this information to campus. University information technology KSIS announcement on the Open/Alternative Icon (fig. Introduction to the new student fee” (sent to all faculty, staff, and students; see fig. Awareness promotion encouraging students to look for courses with the O icon (sent through student focused version of “K-State Today”; see fig.

Lessons Learned and Future Goals

Local resources, including student support, were used throughout the design and implementation of the open/alternative textbook icon at K-State. While support was obtained from a multitude of areas at the university, no additional funds were dedicated for the development and implementation of the O icon. Like many things in the history of the K-State Open/Alternative Textbook Initiative, this icon started with the students. The open/alternative icon has served the university well and initiative leaders have grown to appreciate its simplicity.

Key Takeaways

Keep it simple: If the focus had been on a simple, effective icon from the beginning it would have saved institutional time and resources. Though stakeholders hoped for a more creatively designed icon that would excite everyone, the process of arriving at an acceptable choice is what took the most amount of time. Trying to get the “right” design delayed implementation and deprived students of the icon’s benefit.
Student perspective and enthusiasm is critical.
Be persistent: While students were instrumental in getting the idea started, and initially led the effort, initiative leaders did have to take the lead to finish implementation, working with the necessary partners when student focus waned due to course demands, SGA responsibilities, and life matters.
Involve all implementing partners throughout the process, ideally meeting together: Initiative leaders were fortunate to work with a willing implementing team. This meant that ideas were discussed among the implementing team and then passed along to the icon development partners.

Future Assessment

A formal assessment mechanism was not a component of the initiative’s implementation, but developing one is a future goal.

Historical Context: K-State Course Catalogs

Course catalogs were published under the following titles:

Catalogue of the officers and students of the Kansas State Agricultural College, with a brief history of the institution, 1st (1863/4)
Annual catalogue of the officers and students of the Kansas State Agricultural College for, 2nd (1864/5)-4th (1868/9)
Catalogue of the officers and students of the Kansas State Agricultural College for the year, 1869-1871/2
Hand-book of the Kansas State Agricultural College, Manhattan, Kansas, 1873/4
Biennial catalogue of the Kansas State Agricultural College, Manhattan, Kansas, calendar years, 1875/77
Catalogue of the State Agricultural College of Kansas, 1877/80-1896/97
Annual catalogue of the officers, students and graduates of the Kansas State Agricultural College, Manhattan, 35th (1897/98)-46th (1908/09)
Catalogue, 47th (1909/10)-67th (1929/30)
Complete catalogue number, 68th (1930/31)-81st (1943/1944)
Catalogue, 1945/1946-1948/1949?
General catalogue, 1949/1950?-1958/1960
General catalog, 1960/1962-1990/1992.

These catalogs provide a historical record of the courses offered, the faculty, and the students at K-State over the years.

Student Perspectives on K-State's Online Flexibility

K-State has been a blessing. The flexibility of K-State Online really allowed me to fulfill my goal. Everything I studied online lent itself to what I was physically doing with the students in the field in the community. It really developed my ability to serve more youth.Amanda Frey, ‘17 Family and Community Services Master’sTo have a support system of teachers and advisors who are willing to reach out, whose goal is to see you graduate - that’s a big deal. You’re able to personalize your schedule around daily life.

tags: #kansas #state #university #course #catalog