Defining the Personal Learning Community

In the ever-evolving landscape of education, the concept of a personal learning community (PLC) has gained prominence as a means to enhance the learning experience for both students and educators. PLCs represent a shift towards collaborative, inquiry-based approaches to professional development and curriculum enhancement. This article delves into the definition of personal learning communities, exploring their characteristics, benefits, and the factors that contribute to their success.

Understanding the Core of Learning Communities

At its heart, a learning community is an intentionally developed group that exists to promote and maximize the individual and shared learning of its members. As Lenning et al. (2013) define it, such a community involves ongoing interaction, interplay, and collaboration among members as they strive for specified common learning goals. This definition highlights the importance of intentionality, shared purpose, and active engagement in the pursuit of learning.

Diverse Structures and Purposes

Learning communities can take various forms, each tailored to specific needs and contexts. Faith Gabelnick, Jean MacGregor, Roberta S. Matthews, and Barbara Leigh Smith, in their 1990 publication, describe a learning community as any curricular structure that links together existing courses or restructures curricular material entirely. This linkage provides students with opportunities for deeper understanding and integration of the material, as well as increased interaction with one another and their teachers.

Nancy Shapiro and Jodi Levine (1999) cite Alexander Astin’s (1985) work, emphasizing that learning communities can be organized along curricular lines, common career interests, avocational interests, residential living areas, and so on. This broad scope demonstrates the adaptability of the learning community model to diverse student populations and institutional goals.

Key Goals and Benefits

George Kuh (2008) states that the key goals for learning communities are to encourage the integration of learning across courses and to involve students with "big questions" that matter beyond the classroom. Students take two or more linked courses as a group and work closely with one another and with their professors. Many learning communities explore a common topic and/or common readings through the lens of different disciplines. Some intentionally link ‘liberal arts’ and ‘professional courses’; others feature service learning.

Chun-Mei Zhao and George D. Kuh (2004) enumerate the benefits of participating in learning communities, noting improved GPAs, and higher retention and satisfaction for undergraduate students. These benefits underscore the potential of learning communities to positively impact student success.

Essential Principles and Themes

Several principles and themes should be incorporated into the development of learning communities to ensure their effectiveness. Schroeder and Mable (1994) offer six specific principles:

Small, Unique, and Cohesive Units: Learning communities are generally small, unique, and cohesive units characterized by a common sense of purpose and powerful peer influences.
Student Interaction: Student interaction within learning communities should be characterized by the four I’s - involvement, investment, influence, and identity.
Bounded Territory: Learning communities involve bounded territory that provides easy access to and control of group space that supports ongoing interaction and social stability.
Student-Centered Approach: Learning communities should be primarily student-centered, not staff-centered, to promote student learning. Staff must assume that students are capable and responsible young adults who are primarily responsible for the quality and extent of their learning.
Collaborative Partnerships: Effective learning communities should be the result of collaborative partnerships between faculty, students, and residence hall staff.
Clear Values and Expectations: Learning communities should exhibit a clear set of values and normative expectations for active participation.

These principles emphasize the importance of creating a supportive, student-centered environment that fosters collaboration and shared responsibility for learning.

Addressing Misconceptions about PLCs

Because of the ambiguity and evolution of the term, there are misconceptions about what PLCs are and what they do. PLCs are not:

Any group of individuals with an interest in education: Some groups of people who are passionate about education may meet regularly to discuss research or education best practices. These are not PLCs. Simply being interested in the state of education or educational research topics isn’t enough to qualify a group as a PLC. To be a PLC, the group must come from within a specific educational community. It’s made up of school or district staff members. Yes, these people all share a common interest in education because it’s part of their jobs! But they’re also working together to better their educational institutions. They don’t meet simply to share and gain knowledge. Instead, PLCs focus on setting goals and making decisions that are anchored in bettering student learning and achievement.
Administrator-provided professional development courses: School and district administrators may provide professional development (PD) courses or sessions on PLCs to educate teachers about them or provide tips to make them run more effectively. The PD session is not the same as a professional learning community. PD is a tool PLCs can use to learn and evolve, but not the PLC itself.
Regularly-scheduled meetings: A professional learning community isn’t a meeting. It’s not defined by a date on the calendar or start and end times on a clock. Meetings and discussions are part of the PLC cycle. Without them, when would members have time to collaborate? But the PLC isn’t the meeting. It’s the community of dedicated educators and the ongoing work that they do both inside and outside of meeting times.
Programs that you can purchase: A professional learning community isn’t a program you can buy and implement at your school. It’s not something that comes with step-by-step instructions that you can follow to see immediate results. Instead, a PLC is a group committed to creating and sustaining processes that grow and change as staff and students change. You may purchase educational or data-collection tools to help your PLC do its work and operate more efficiently, but the program isn’t the PLC.

Factors Influencing the Success of Learning Communities

Several factors can influence the success of learning communities, including:

Read also: Learning Resources for Ironworkers

Broad Support: Broad support from both faculty and staff is essential - collaboration must be present from the inception of the learning community development process.
Stable Leadership: Stable leadership and an administrative “home” will ensure a greater chance for long-term stability and success.
Appropriate Design and Theme: Selection of an appropriate design and theme to appeal to students’ academic and personal goals is important.

Additionally, faculty involvement is crucial. Golde & Pribbenow (2000) found that faculty members are often enticed by the idea of participating in interdisciplinary and innovative education. However, they also identified potential challenges, such as concerns about time commitment and a lack of understanding between faculty and student affairs professionals.

The PLC Process: A Deeper Dive

The PLC process is not a program; it is an ongoing process in which educators work collaboratively in recurring cycles of collective inquiry and action research to achieve better results for the students they serve. PLCs operate under the assumption that the key to improved learning for students is continuous job-embedded learning for educators. The very essence of a learning community is a focus on and a commitment to the learning of each student.

Key Components of the PLC Process

Focus on Learning: A PLC is dedicated to the idea that their organization exists to ensure that all students learn essential knowledge, skills, and dispositions.
Collaborative Teams: Educators work in collaborative teams to analyze student work, share best practices, and develop common assessments.
Collective Inquiry: Teams engage in collective inquiry into both best practices in teaching and best practices in learning.
Action Orientation: Members of PLCs are action oriented: they move quickly to turn aspirations into action and visions into reality.
Continuous Improvement: A persistent disquiet with the status quo and a constant search for a better way to achieve goals and accomplish the purpose of the organization.
Results Orientation: All efforts in these areas must be assessed on the basis of results rather than intentions.

The Importance of Collaboration

Collaboration is a means to an end, not the end itself. The teams in a PLC engage in collective inquiry into both best practices in teaching and best practices in learning. They also inquire about their current reality including their present practices and the levels of achievement of their students. They attempt to arrive at consensus on vital questions by building shared knowledge rather than pooling opinions.

Action and Continuous Improvement

Inherent to a PLC are a persistent disquiet with the status quo and a constant search for a better way to achieve goals and accomplish the purpose of the organization. The goal is not simply to learn a new strategy, but instead to create conditions for a perpetual learning environment in which innovation and experimentation are viewed not as tasks to be accomplished or projects to be completed but as ways of conducting day-to-day business-forever.

Focus on Results

Members of a PLC realize that all of their efforts in these areas (a focus on learning, collaborative teams, collective inquiry, action orientation, and continuous improvement) must be assessed on the basis of results rather than intentions. Unless initiatives are subjected to ongoing assessment on the basis of tangible results, they represent random groping in the dark rather than purposeful improvement.

Research and Assessment

Taylor et al. (2003) highlight the importance of ongoing research and assessment in learning communities. They recommend:

Identifying and assessing a broader scope of learning community outcomes - for students, faculty, and institutions.
Exploring the specific pedagogical and structural characteristics that lead to positive outcomes.
Pursuing longitudinal inquiry to examine the long-term impact of learning communities - for students, faculty, and institutions.
Improving presentations and publications about learning community research.

Challenges and Considerations

Despite their potential benefits, learning communities also face challenges. Lenning & Ebbers (1999) note concerns about the allocation of resources and the need for universities to value practices that improve learning, rather than solely focusing on admitting excellent high school students.

The current definition of quality in higher education preferences schools that accept excellent high school students with excellent ratings. However, there is no value placed on what happens during college. A school could accept excellent high school students and teach them nothing and receive high ratings, while another school may accept mediocre students and teach them a great deal. In the current valuation system, a campus that wants to increase its prestige shifts resources to competitive admissions, not practices to improve learning.

Learning Communities in Practice

Learning communities can take many forms. The learning community approach fundamentally restructures the curriculum and the time and space of students. Many different curricular restructuring models are being used.

Federated learning communities: Similar to a learning cluster, but with an additional seminar course taught by a "Master Learner", a faculty member who enrolls in the other courses and takes them alongside the students.
Coordinated studies: This model blurs the lines between individual courses.

Connecting to Broader Concepts

Micro-foundations are based on studies to understand how groups and teams increase their capabilities to work effectively together. describe organizational learning as a dynamic process, where new ideas and actions move from individuals to the organization and at the same time organization return feedback as data what have been learned and experienced in the past. Feed-back from the organization comes to the individual through groups and vice versa. They divided organizational learning into three levels where individual learning is based on intuiting and interpreting while group learning is based on interpreting and integrating, and finally, the organization is about institutionalizing. When these theses are compared with other scholars' studies, there can be found many similar exposes, also prove that groups are basic blocks which make a base for organizational learning.

The Role of Community

Community psychologists such as McMillan and Chavis (1986) state that four key factors defined a sense of community: "(1) membership, (2) influence, (3) fulfillment of individuals needs and (4) shared events and emotional connections. So, the participants of learning community must feel some sense of loyalty and belonging to the group (membership) that drive their desire to keep working and helping others, also the things that the participants do must affect what happens in the community; that means, an active and not just a reactive performance (influence).

tags: #personal #learning #community #definition