Direct Instruction: A Comprehensive Guide to Definition, Implementation, and Effectiveness

Direct instruction (DI) is an explicit teaching method where teachers use well-developed and carefully planned lessons to teach specific skills to their students. The teacher typically stands at the front of a room and presents information, matching instruction to the task to enhance students’ understanding of a topic. This technique depends on strict lesson plans with little room for variation.

Origins and Evolution of Direct Instruction

The procedures now known as DI originated in the 1960s with instruction designed to teach highly at-risk students at the Bereiter-Engelmann Preschool, at the University of Illinois (Bereiter & Engelmann, 1966). Across decades the model has been further developed by Engelmann, Doug Carnine, Ed Kame’enui, Jerry Silbert, and others at the University of Oregon.

Over time DI has evolved in at least three directions: the abilities and characteristics of the students served, the content and subject matter taught, and the refinement of the logic and practices that make up DI.

Siegfried “Zig” Engelmann devoted his life to designing instructional programs that accelerate children’s learning. He was convinced that given the right instruction, all children could learn. Engelmann's steadfast belief that “Whatever the kid does is the truth!” drove an unwavering commitment to the learner’s behavior as the prime determinant of instructional efficiency.

Core Principles of Direct Instruction

Direct Instruction (DI) is a powerful teaching system that combines logical analysis and testing of the content students are to learn, thoughtful selection and sequencing of instructional examples, clear communication between teacher and student, high rates of student engagement, reinforcement and corrective feedback, judicious review, and practice to mastery.

Read also: Your Guide to Nursing Internships

The Engelmann and Carnine theory possesses the most critical attributes of natural science theories: (1) it is exhaustive in that it covers everything from the most basic motor skill instruction to the highest of the “higher order” thinking skills, and (2) it does so economically. In short, it is parsimonious.

A commitment to logical thinking underlies the DI principles and procedures elucidated in Engelmann and Carnine’s (1991) Theory of Instruction. However, logic by itself was (and still is) insufficient for developing a cohesive, workable, effective instructional technology. Empirical validation is vital. Engelmann (2009) reported that as DI was being developed, each time the authors formulated a principle, strategy, or tactic, they asked each other, “Do you know of any studies confirming this?” Nine times out of 10 the answer was no, so they conducted experiments.

Key Components of Direct Instruction

Direct instruction has certain characteristics: an academic focus; a teacher-directed curriculum; clarity to goals; review of past learning; presentation of new material in small steps; the monitoring of student progress through questioning; provision for feedback with corrections; provision for independent exercise; and the revision of the lesson's goals based on review.

Direct instruction (DI) is the explicit teaching of a skill set using lectures or demonstrations of the material to students. DI teaches by explicit instruction, in contrast to exploratory models such as inquiry-based learning. DI includes tutorials, participatory laboratory classes, discussions, recitation, seminars, workshops, observation, active learning, practicum, or internships. DI relies on a systematic and scripted curriculum, delivered by highly trained instructors.

Explicit Instruction

Explicit instruction involves direct explanation. Concepts are clearly explained and skills are clearly modeled, without vagueness or ambiguity. The teacher’s language is concise, specific, and related to the objective. Another characteristic of explicit instruction is a visible instructional approach which includes a high level of teacher/student interaction. Explicit instruction means that the actions of the teacher are clear, unambiguous, direct, and visible. This makes it clear what the students are to do and learn. Nothing is left to guess work.

Systematic Instruction

The goal of systematic instruction is one of maximizing the likelihood that whenever students are asked to learn something new, they already possess the appropriate prior knowledge and understanding to see its value and to learn it efficiently. The plan for instruction that is systematic is carefully thought out, builds upon prior learning, is strategic building from simple to complex, and is designed before activities and lessons are planned.

Implementation of Direct Instruction

The implementation of Direct Instruction and the five key philosophical principles will introduce a crucial element in the school system: change. Teachers will generally be required to behave differently than before and schools may need an entirely different organization than they previously employed. Even staff members will be called upon to alter some operations. The popular valuing of teacher creativity and autonomy as high priorities must give way to a willingness to follow certain carefully prescribed instructional practices. Remaining the same, however, are the importance of hard work, dedication and commitment to students. And, it is crucial that all concerned adopt and internalize the belief that all students, if properly taught, can learn.

Grouping Students

When employed correctly, students are grouped based on their ability level rather than their grade level. Before being promoted to a higher-level group, students work closely with an instructor and have several opportunities to practice and demonstrate mastery of a skill.

Using Direct Instruction, students can advance at their own pace. In a Direct Instruction math class, three groups of students may be working on three separate ideas at the same time, ensuring that each student is working at his or her own level alongside classmates. The target that students are attempting to hit is well-known. They are allowed to move on to the next concept/learning topic when they indicate that they are ready. Students remain engaged and progressing because the work is neither too difficult nor too easy, and the learning objectives are clearly defined.

Curriculum Development

Developers of Direct Instruction curriculum follow a specific protocol before a program is implemented in classrooms across the country. Developers review all state and national standards and then analyze current curricula. They develop a program and pilot it with anywhere from twelve to thirty students. As students work through this material, teachers review the process and change areas that are not appropriate for implementation. There can be up to four or so revisions to any particular program before a curriculum is determined to be appropriate for distribution.

Typical Application

Kozloff outlines a typical application of Direct Instruction. First, teachers frame the task that the students will learn. The teacher models information verbally or through demonstration. The teacher may repeat the model to ensure that all students have observed the model. Teachers lead the students to repeat information and then perform a routine together, repeating the routine until all students have expressed understanding. Students then perform the task independently and are tested to see if they have acquired the material. The teacher then verifies what the students have learned, and praises their efforts. Skills are taught until student responses have reached automaticity and students are able to generalize their learning into new and untaught situations.

Assessments

Testing is a frequent part of Direct Instruction. Teachers assure mastery throughout the learning process, determining who is moving ahead or falling behind. Students are moved from one achievement group to the other, to assure that all students are progressing. Direct Instruction requires 100 percent mastery before the teacher goes on to the next subset of skills or activities.

Applications of Direct Instruction

Direct Instruction is used with students from every population segment (with regard to poverty, culture, and race).

Components of DI have been adapted to meet the needs of learners receiving special education services (Marchand-Martella et al., 2005) including learners with autism (Vidovic et al., 2021).

Improving Reading Instruction

Direct instruction is used to teach basic skills in reading. Teachers explain a reading skill, step-by-step, and supervise practice. Instruction begins with phonemic awareness activities that includes the direct teaching of a set of letter-sound relationships in a clearly defined sequence, and then moves to include complex phonics and decoding lessons, and progresses to a focus on comprehension and analysis of content. Study skills are also covered in reading instruction, including use of reference materials, graphs, tables and maps.

Improving Reading Comprehension

For those teachers involved in literature-based learning, Direct Instruction is appropriate for enhancing the reading comprehension of students. As discussed by John Savage, Direct Instruction is particularly effective with students whose intellectual abilities are below those of others of the same chronological age. Direct Instruction appears to be most appropriate for teaching specific comprehension strategies such as: showing causal relationships in texts; using graphic and semantic organizers; using questioning to guide and monitor student learning; teaching students to ask questions about their reading; recognizing story structure; and for summarization. Steps to providing clear direct instruction include: direct explanation, modeling, guided practice and application.

Vocabulary Instruction

Direct Instruction is an effective way to teach vocabulary, particularly when the words represent complex concepts that are not readily used in day-to-day experiences. This method of teaching vocabulary - providing students with specific word instruction and teaching word-learning strategies - leads to improved reading comprehension.

Other Applications

Physical education programs have also incorporated Direct Instruction in their curriculum, as a way to implement and assess basic skills. Demonstration is a major part of the modeling in physical education programs.

Teachers in science programs also support the implementation of Direct Instruction in their curriculum. David Klahr, professor of psychology at Carnegie Mellon University, has reviewed a spectrum of teaching methods in science instruction and has asserted that Direct Instruction has its place in the science classroom. Direct Instruction becomes an effective model when teaching a process. Specifically, the design of experiments is an activity that is easily retained when Direct Instruction is used to promote this skill.

Evidence-Based Effectiveness

The data are in: DI works. Yet, how does it work? How does DI enable teachers to teach more to more learners in less time? The key is an adherence to a logical, coherent, and testable (i.e., falsifiable) theory of instruction.

Steadfast belief in the motto, “If the student has not learned, the program has not taught” (Barbash, 2012, p. 2) has motivated DI developers and researchers to craft rigorously designed and field-tested programs for teaching reading, math, writing, spelling, and thinking skills to children.

The BESD of results from one meta-analysis led the authors to conclude DI benefits an additional 44 per 100 students over the other curricula that were reviewed in the meta-analysis. Regardless of background, DI increased academic achievement from 28% to 72%.

The Colorado Department of Education notes that the effectiveness of direct instruction for teaching literacy is well-supported by research, as demonstrated by Adams & Englemann’s comprehensive review and meta-analysis of 30+ studies on the effectiveness of direct instruction, as well as in the findings of the National Reading Panel.

According to a study, schools that implemented the Direct Instruction model achieved significantly higher results within one year and maintained them for the next six years.

In Project Follow Through, the DI model was ranked first in achievement for poor students, students who were not poor, urban students, rural students, African American students, Hispanic students, and Native American students.

Recent large-scale studies (1997-2003), such as the Baltimore Curriculum Project, show that it is possible to help schools that are in the lowest twenty percentile with respect to academic achievement steadily improve until they are performing well above average.

Criticisms and Considerations

Direct instruction has a number of critics, who believe that it has little room for personalization or adaptability.

Some people associate direct instruction with a lecture-style session in which students are passively absorbing knowledge and taking notes at their desks, but this is not the case.

The term "direct instruction" has recently come to be associated with a negative connotation. Unfortunately, the term is often associated with old teaching methods, in which students sit silently while the professor gives the lecture. The negative connotation of direct instruction stems from the term's narrow definition. When teachers rely primarily on direct instruction, the disadvantages of direct instruction become apparent.

Another common concern with Direct Instruction programs is their expense. Many argue that the current expense of implementing Direct Instruction programs is too high and unreasonable for low SES schools and school districts.

The former president of the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), Anne Tweed, questioned whether direct instruction was the most effective science teaching strategy.

Some critics also see DI as a betrayal of the humanistic, egalitarian foundations of adult public education.

tags: #direct #instruction #in #education #definition