UCLA and Michigan Basketball: A Storied History
The UCLA and Michigan basketball programs boast rich traditions and have significantly impacted the landscape of college basketball. From UCLA's unprecedented dominance under Coach John Wooden to Michigan's recent resurgence, the two schools have shared some memorable moments on the court.
UCLA's Dynasty Years (1960s-1970s)
UCLA's men's basketball program, established in 1919, has won a record 11 NCAA titles. The Bruins' historic run of nine national championships in 10 years (and 10 in 12 years) started in the 1964 NCAA tournament, when the Bruins knocked off the Duke Blue Devils in the first national title game appearance for both schools. Coach John Wooden led the Bruins to 10 national titles in 12 seasons, from 1964 to 1975, including seven straight from 1967 to 1973. UCLA went undefeated a record four times (1964, 1967, 1972, and 1973).
Before Wooden's arrival, UCLA had only won two conference championships in the previous 18 years. In his first season, Wooden guided a UCLA team that had finished with a 12-13 record the previous year to a 22-7 record-then the most wins in a season in program history-and the Pacific Coast Conference (PCC) Southern Division championship. In his second season, Wooden led the Bruins to a 24-7 record and the PCC championship. The Bruins would win the division title in each of the next two seasons and the conference title in the latter season. In 1955-56, Wooden guided the Bruins to their first undefeated PCC conference title and a 17-game winning streak that only came to an end in the 1956 NCAA Tournament at the hands of a University of San Francisco team that featured Bill Russell.
By 1962 the probation was no longer in place and Wooden had returned the Bruins to the top of their conference (now the Pac-12 Conference). This time, however, they would take the next step, and go on to unleash a run of dominance unparalleled in the history of college sports. Wooden's team repeated as national champions the following season before the squad fell briefly in 1966 when it finished second in the conference to Oregon State. UCLA was ineligible to play in the NCAA tournament that year because in those days only conference champions went to the tournament. However, the Bruins' incarnation returned with a vengeance in 1967 with the arrival of sophomore All-America and MVP Lew Alcindor.
Wooden coached his final game in Pauley Pavilion on March 1, 1975, when UCLA trounced Stanford 93-59. During his tenure with the Bruins, Wooden became known as the "Wizard of Westwood", although he personally disdained the nickname. He gained lasting fame at UCLA by winning 620 games in 27 seasons and 10 NCAA titles during his last 12 seasons, which included seven in a row from 1967 to 1973. His UCLA teams also had a then-record winning streak of 88 games and four perfect 30-0 seasons. They also won 38 straight games in NCAA Tournaments and 98 straight home game wins at Pauley Pavilion. Wooden was named NCAA College Basketball's "Coach of the Year" in 1964, 1967, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972 and 1973. In 1967, he was named the Henry Iba Award USBWA College Basketball Coach of the Year. In 1972, he shared Sports Illustrated magazine's "Sportsman of the Year" award with Billie Jean King.
Read also: Historic Basketball Game
The 1965 National Championship Game
The Bruins defeated the Michigan Wolverines 91-80 in the latter's first national championship game appearance. UCLA won its second national championship in a row in 1965, part of a run of 10 national titles in 12 years. Princeton and Wichita State both made their first Final Four in the 1965 NCAA tournament, with the Tigers winning the third-place game.
Key Matchups
UCLA and Michigan have faced off several times throughout their histories. Some notable matchups include:
- December 14, 1963 - UCLA 74, No. No.
- December 27, 1963 - UCLA 98, No. No.
- March 21, 1964 (NCAA tournament) - UCLA 98, No. No.
- December 29, 1964 - UCLA 93, No. No.
- March 12, 1965 (NCAA tournament) - UCLA 100, No. No.
- March 20, 1965 (NCAA tournament) - UCLA 91, No. No.
Eras After Wooden
From 1975 to 1977, Gene Bartow served as the head coach of UCLA. He guided them to a 52-9 record, including a berth in the 1976 Final Four. Gary Cunningham became the head coach at UCLA in 1977. Larry Brown then moved on to coach UCLA from 1979 to 1981, leading his freshman-dominated 1979-80 team to the NCAA title game before falling to Louisville, 59-54. However, that runner-up finish was later vacated by the NCAA after two players were found to be ineligible. Larry Farmer was the head coach of UCLA from 1981 to 1984, guiding them to a 61-23 (.726) record. In 1984, Walt Hazzard was named the UCLA basketball coach 20 years after he was an All-America when UCLA won its first national championship. He coached for four seasons, winning 77 out of 125 games. The 1984-1985 UCLA Bruin basketball team won the NIT championship.
In 1988, Jim Harrick returned to UCLA (he had spent two years as an assistant coach from 1978 to 1979) to assume head coaching duties after the firing of Walt Hazzard. During the recruiting period before his first season, he recruited Don MacLean, the most significant recruit to commit to UCLA in several years. McLean's arrival helped start a revival of the basketball program. During the 1994-1995 season, he led UCLA to a 32-1 record (a loss to California was subsequently forfeited to the Bruins) and the school's eleventh national championship, its first since the 1974-75 season. The 31 actual wins would stand as a school record until the 2005-06 season. In 1996, Harrick's Bruins were upset in the first round by Princeton. Shortly before the 1997 season, UCLA fired Harrick for lying about who attended a recruiting dinner. Later that season on February 11, 1997, with the Bruins tied for first place in the Pac-10 with an 8-3 record, UCLA removed the "interim" tag from Lavin's title and formally named him as its 11th head coach. The Bruins then won their next 11 games en route to the Pac-10 title, before being eliminated by the Minnesota Gophers in the NCAA Midwest Regional Final.
The Steve Lavin Era (1996-2003)
In seven seasons as head coach Lavin's record was 12-4 in games involving overtime. Additionally Lavin's Bruins had a 10-4 record against the rival USC Trojans. During the period 1997-2002, Lavin's Bruins compiled nine consecutive overtime victories. These included victories over Arizona, Cincinnati (2002 NCAA second round double overtime victory over No. 1 West Region seed), Kentucky, and Stanford (then ranked No 1). At UCLA from 1996 to 2003, Lavin compiled a record of 145-78. As both an assistant and head coach, Lavin participated in 13 consecutive NCAA tournament appearances (1990-2002), while working at Purdue and UCLA. During Lavin's tenure as a head coach, he was one of only two coaches in the country to lead his team to five NCAA "Sweet 16s" in six years (1997, 1998, 2000-2002), the other coach being Duke's Mike Krzyzewski. Lavin signed seven McDonald's High School All-Americans. During Lavin's tenure as head coach, the Bruins qualified for six consecutive NCAA Tournaments (1997-2002). Lavin's record in the first and second rounds of the NCAA tournament is 10-1. His winning percentage (90.9%) in the first two rounds is second only to Dean Smith in NCAA Tournament history.
Read also: History of the Block 'M'
The Bruins defeated the No. Despite some success under the watch of Steve Lavin, the program wanted to regain its position in the college basketball upper echelon. Even the success in the NCAA tournament belied the fact that UCLA had earned no better than a number 4 seed with the exception of the 1997 season. The 2002-03 season turned out to be the back-breaker for Lavin as the Bruins stumbled to a 10-19 record and a 6-12 record in the conference. It was the first losing season for UCLA in over five decades.
The Ben Howland Era
UCLA looked to find a coach that could move the Bruins back to the elite ranks of the Pac-10 and the country. Ben Howland's success at the University of Pittsburgh and his southern California roots made him an attractive candidate. Howland remedied this disappointment in his recruiting efforts. Howland produced a top tier recruiting class from athletes in southern California that fit his Big East style. Starting the 2005-06 season with the majority of the roster made over in Howland's image and with the Lavin hold-overs (e.g., Ryan Hollins and Cedric Bozeman), the Bruins produced an excellent campaign. They finished the regular season 24-6, winning the Pac-10 Conference title. They then roared through the Pac-10 tournament, winning each game by double digits en route to only the second Pac-10 tournament championship in school history. The momentum continued into the NCAA tournament as the second-seeded Bruins defeated Gonzaga in the Sweet Sixteen. They then upset top-seeded Memphis to reach the school's first Final Four in 11 years.
Howland continued his success at UCLA the following year. The Bruins finished undefeated at home for the first time in 22 years, winning the Pac-10 conference title. However they lost in their first Pac-10 tournament game and were seeded second in the NCAA Tournament West Region. After a close second-round win over Indiana, Howland led the Bruins to a win over his former team, Pitt in the Sweet Sixteen. At the start of the 2007-08 season, expectations for UCLA were high.
Michigan Basketball: Recent History and Aspirations
As we draw closer to the month of March, the Michigan men’s basketball team is in the final stretch of what’s been arguably the best season in program history. Even after a loss against the Duke Blue Devils on Saturday, the Wolverines rebounded with a win over Minnesota on Tuesday night - putting them at 26-2 overall and at No. 3 in the AP Poll.
Dusty May has had his squad clicking on all cylinders all season, rolling by even some of its strongest opponents with relative ease. Currently, the Wolverines are averaging a whopping 23.8-point margin of victory and have topped 100 points in eight games this year.
Read also: Comprehensive Guide to Michigan Colleges
If you’ve been following Michigan’s men’s basketball this century, you’d be no stranger to teams being dominant in the Big Ten and making runs in the NCAA Tournament. This team very much has aspirations to do the same, but what fans might not realize is how much better this year’s iteration of the Wolverines is from some of the other “great” teams Michigan has put on the floor recently.
Comparing Recent Michigan Teams
Several recent Michigan teams have achieved significant success. Let's compare some of them:
- 2024-25 (27-10, made Sweet Sixteen): The Wolverines roared back to prominence in Year 1 under Dusty May, being well ahead of the program rebuild schedule. Michigan ended up winning the Big Ten Tournament and made it into the second weekend of the NCAA Tournament before losing to Final Four-bound Auburn Tigers in the Sweet Sixteen. Much like this year’s team, Michigan was led by big men in Danny Wolf and Vlad Goldin. Trey Donaldson led the backcourt, but the group lacked the depth and perimeter shooting that this year’s team has. In 2024-25, Michigan shot 33.2 percent from three-point range on 24.2 attempts, while this year’s team is shooting 36.1 percent on 26.0 attempts per game from deep thanks to further development from L.J. Cason and the additions of Trey McKenney and Elliott Cadeau. Both teams were strong defensively, but this year’s group has the extra offensive punch and bench depth last year’s team lacked.
- 2020-21 (23-5, made Elite Eight): The COVID season looked to be the outlier in Juwan Howard’s tenure, as the Wolverines won the Big Ten regular season title before losing in the Elite Eight to UCLA. It compares to this year’s team in a few ways, but both teams were notably deep with guys like Chaundee Brown, Brandon Johns and Austin Davis giving meaningful minutes off the bench. Furthermore, this team had a star freshman in the paint with Hunter Dickinson, logging 14.1 points and 7.4 rebounds per game. The 2020-21 team was defensively dominant, holding opponents to 65.1 points per game and it was loaded with three-point shooting (38.1 percent from deep), but was perhaps a bit one-dimensional in its offensive attack. If the shots weren’t falling, other scoring options were slim, while the 2025-26 team is able to attack the interior (with Aday Mara, Morez Johnson Jr. and Yaxel Lendeborg) in addition to catching fire from deep.
- 2018-19 (30-7, made Sweet Sixteen): Like the many John Beilein teams we’re about to look at, the 2018-19 team was suffocating on the defensive end while not being all that prolific offensively. This was the year Jordan Poole and Ignas Brazdeikis led the way, while the veteran Charles Matthews put together the most productive season of his Michigan tenure. Meanwhile, Jon Teske stepped in admirably as the new starting center in place of Moritz Wagner. The problem was Teske proved to be the only reliable big man for the Wolverines that season, a big departure from the three-headed monster Michigan currently features. And while the backcourt was top-heavy, it was light on experience, with Brazdeikis, Poole and Zavier Simpson having to shoulder too much of the load. Although it turned out to be a great season, things fizzled out against Texas Tech in the Sweet Sixteen with a season-low 44 points scored. This year’s team features much more depth, shooting, and experience, meaning it’d be hard for it to face a similar fate come tournament time.
- 2017-18 (33-8, made National Championship): Thirty-three wins in 2017-18 represents the highest total in program history, and it looks like this year’s team could surpass that number. Once again, Michigan rode its defense and a late-season surge all the way to the National Championship before ultimately being outmatched by a highly-talented Villanova team. Moritz Wagner was the star here, scoring 14.6 points per game while Charles Matthews, Muhammad-Ali Abdur-Rahkman and Zavier Simpson were impact players as well. Similar to the 2018-19 team, the lack of depth and experience ultimately proved to be weaknesses, something the 2025-26 team has in spades. The team was impressive from the outside (35.7 percent from deep), but was perhaps over-reliant on the three-pointer with limited options for interior scoring.
- 2013-14 (28-9, made Elite Eight): Coming off a trip to the National Championship, the Wolverines were still extremely impressive in 2013-14 despite losing Trey Burke, Tim Hardaway Jr. and not having Mitch McGary for most of the season. Nik Stauskas was the man on this team, averaging 17.5 points per game while shooting a blistering 44.2 percent from beyond the arc. Beside him were Glenn Robinson III, Caris LeVert, Derrick Walton Jr. and Jordan Morgan. Where this team falls short compared to the 2025-26 roster is once again on the interior. With McGary’s lingering back issues causing him to miss so much time, Morgan and Jon Horford shouldered the load. And while the backcourt was highly productive on a nightly basis, it wasn’t enough as the Wolverines bowed out against a talented Kentucky team in the Elite Eight.
- 2012-13 (31-8, made National Championship): Perhaps one of the most favorably remembered Michigan teams of all time, Burke led the 2012-13 team all the way to the National Championship before losing in heartbreaking fashion to Louisville. Another strong defensive team under Beilein, the Wolverines held opponents to just 63.8 points per game while boasting the third-best offensive rating in the country that season at 116.1. This group compares pretty favorably actually to the 2025-26 bunch, with a group of bigs led by McGary and solid guards and depth across the board. Obviously with Burke leading the way, the 2012-13 team is better in the backcourt than this year’s team, and was more prolific shooting the ball from deep (38.5 percent as a team), but this year’s group is a bit better in the paint, particularly on defense.
As you can see with many of Michigan’s “great” teams from recent history, they’ve boasted great depth and the ability to shoot the three-pointer well. Michigan’s 2025-26 guard depth, perimeter shooting and perimeter defense slot it in well with the great teams of the past, but it also has the offensive and defensive ability of its big men that can carry the group further than other teams have been able to go.
tags: #michigan #ucla #basketball #history
