Understanding Student Computer Application Requirements at Missouri State University

Navigating the world of higher education often involves understanding specific requirements for courses, including technology. At Missouri State University, a policy exists to govern student technology requirements, ensuring fairness and accessibility. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of these requirements, outlining the approval process, considerations, and exceptions.

Defining Student Technology Requirements

A student technology requirement refers to instances where specific technology, such as devices or software, is mandated for a particular student in a particular class. It's important to note that this policy is applicable only when technology is actually required, not when its use is merely suggested or recommended. Furthermore, the policy does not extend to electronic textbooks.

The Approval Process

Any technology requirement that exceeds $150 necessitates approval from the dean of the appropriate college. This ensures a level of oversight and helps to maintain affordability for students.

Submitting a Proposal

Those proposing a student technology requirement must engage stakeholders and gather their input. This is done using a Student Technology Requirement Proposal Input Form, which must be completed and submitted along with the proposal.

Key Considerations for Approval

The dean considers several factors when deciding whether to approve or deny a technology requirement proposal. These factors aim to ensure that the requirement is necessary, affordable, and accessible.

Stakeholder Recommendations

Recommendations received from stakeholders play a significant role in the decision-making process. These recommendations provide valuable insights into the potential impact of the requirement on students.

Necessity and Cost-Effectiveness

The dean will assess whether a less restrictive and/or less expensive requirement would suffice. The aim is to ensure that the less expensive technology is sufficient for the proposed use, avoiding unnecessary financial burden on students.

Alternative Access

Another important consideration is whether students can access the technology through other means. If students have alternative ways to access the required technology, it may influence the decision to approve the requirement.

Circumstances Where Technology Use is Left to Student Discretion

In some cases, the choice of technology is best left to the students' discretion. This might involve situations where various devices, software, and other technologies perform similar functions. Allowing students to choose the technology that best suits their needs and preferences can promote flexibility and personalized learning.

Overlap with Other Courses

The dean will consider whether a similar function is already required for another course. This prevents redundant technology requirements and minimizes the overall cost for students.

Exceptions to the Policy

There are specific circumstances under which the policy may not apply. Technology may be provided to students under appropriate circumstances, potentially waiving the individual requirement.

Adherence to Policy

It is crucial that departments and faculty do not implement technology requirements without following the procedures outlined in this policy. This ensures transparency, fairness, and compliance with university guidelines.

Compliance with Disability Laws

All technology requirements must comply with applicable disability discrimination laws. This ensures that students with disabilities have equal access to the required technology and can participate fully in their courses.

Examples of Computer-Based Tests for Military Personnel

While the Missouri State University policy focuses on general student technology requirements, it's worth noting the prevalence of computer-based testing in other sectors, such as the military. Here are a few examples:

Armed Forces Classification Test (AFCT)

Soldiers who need to improve their original ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) score may be administered the AFCT via the online iCAT. The iCAT replaces the paper-based version of the Armed Forces Classification Test (AFCT). Soldiers may not be given the AFCT earlier than six months after the date of their MEPS ASVAB exam. The AFCT must be administered in its entirety. There is an AFCT Preparation Course. The Online Academic Skills Course (OASC) is designed to help Soldiers prepare for the AFCT. This course is self-paced and customized based on your answers on a pre-assessment. Lessons utilize interactive exercises such as drag-and-drop matching, video game-style multiple choice, and dynamic flash cards. Quizzes and practice problem sets also help students gauge their mastery of the material. Lessons include the following areas: reading comprehension, math, and vocabulary. The OASC is available to all ARNG Soldiers.

Section Instrument Flight Training (SIFT)

The SIFT is a computer-based test battery that was developed using industry-standard scientific methods to predict the success of students in aviation training programs. The complete test battery is used as a primary selection instrument for the Army aviation program.

Defense Language Proficiency Test (DLPT)

The DLPT is a computer-based battery of foreign language tests produced by the Defense Language Institute (DLI) and used by the DoD to document foreign language proficiency of Service members.

DANTES Support

Defense Activity for Non-Traditional Education Support (DANTES) provides numerous programs and services to assist service members seeking to further their voluntary education goals and objectives.

tags: #missouri #state #university #student #computer #applications